Quantcast The Lawrentian
College Media Network

Point-Counterpoint

The cost of going universal

Stephen Flynn

Issue date: 2/1/08 Section: Opinions & Editorials
  • Print
  • Email
Ryan Day and I see the same problem: An unacceptable number of Americans suffer preventable deaths, which can be attributed to the millions who cannot afford health insurance. We all want more people to have access to higher quality healthcare. Where Day and I differ is the direction our country should be moving to solve this problem. He wants more government involvement in the healthcare industry while I believe that the healthcare costs can be reduced by better government policies that facilitate competition in a freer market.

There are many factors driving the rising cost of healthcare -- too many to explore in this article. But one of them is defensive medicine, where doctors order tests for patients that are usually unnecessary in order to mitigate a potential malpractice lawsuit. In this case, government power is being frivolously wielded against medical providers thus increasing everybody's healthcare costs, and this is something that should be reformed.

The largest component of increased healthcare costs, 57 percent of it, is inflation according to a 2006 report by PricewaterhouseCoopers. Inflation is caused by the Federal Reserve printing money to fund government deficit spending.

Universal healthcare would cause government spending to skyrocket and increase the deficit. A bigger deficit would lead to more inflation which pushes healthcare costs up. If you increase taxes to make up for the deficit then you risk stunting economic growth.

If we want more people to have access to affordable healthcare, we need to free the healthcare market. Ask anybody who took introductory economics: a free market where prices fluctuate according to supply and demand is a more efficient way to allocate resources than the type of central government planning that a universal healthcare system would require. We need federal laws to create an even playing field between employer-provided healthcare and individually purchased plans.

Employer-based health insurance was a creation of the government as the National War Labor Board during World War II exempted fringe benefits such as healthcare from a national wage freeze. To this day, employer-based health benefits are tax deductible and employees are used to the idea of health benefits, which they demand during the job hunt.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Be the first to comment on this story

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

Who will you be voting for on Nov. 4?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement